ThirdLifeResearch › Screen Time Statistics Australia
ThirdLife Research

Screen time in Australia: the data behind a world-first experiment

Last updated 3 July 2026 · Compiled by the ThirdLife team from primary sources

Australia is running the world's most-watched experiment in children's digital regulation: since 10 December 2025, major platforms have been required to keep under-16s off social media accounts. Six months in, the compliance data is sobering, parents' concerns remain the highest-ranked child health issue in the country, and the gap between rules and reality has never been better documented. Here are the numbers.

Key takeaways

  • The social media minimum age took effect 10 December 2025, covering Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit, X and others — a world first.
  • Compliance is struggling: eSafety data from March 2026 showed about 7 in 10 underage children still held accounts, and a June 2026 BMJ study found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms.
  • In response, the government moved in June 2026 to double maximum penalties to $99 million and strengthen eSafety's information-gathering powers.
  • Before the rules, 84% of Australian kids aged 8–12 had already used social media or messaging apps (eSafety, 2024).
  • Excessive screen time is Australian parents' #1 child health concern, cited by more than 90% (Royal Children's Hospital National Child Health Poll).

The under-16 minimum age: what the law does

Under amendments to the Online Safety Act, 'age-restricted social media platforms' must take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from holding accounts. The obligation sits entirely on platforms — there are no penalties for children or parents — and as of 10 December 2025 it applies to Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit, Threads, X, Kick and Twitch, among others. Under-16s can still view public content without logging in, and messaging, gaming and education services are excluded. eSafety frames it as "a delay, not a ban": the target is the account-based design features — algorithmic feeds, notification streams, engagement mechanics — that the regulator links to harms to young people's health and wellbeing.

Six months in: the compliance picture

7 in 10

underage children still held social media accounts months after the rules began.

eSafety Commissioner data, March 2026
85%

of surveyed Australian 12–17-year-olds were using restricted platforms.

British Medical Journal, June 2026
$99m

the doubled maximum penalty announced in June 2026 for non-compliant platforms.

Australian Government, June 2026

The enforcement story is moving quickly. eSafety's March 2026 implementation update flagged five platforms for age-check compliance issues, and its data showed roughly seven in ten underage children on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok still held accounts. A British Medical Journal study published in late June 2026 found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms, with self-declared ages and selfie uploads — the weakest verification methods — the most common checks encountered. Within days, the Prime Minister announced legislation to double maximum penalties to $99 million and give eSafety the power to compel platforms (and third parties like age-assurance providers) to produce evidence of their compliance efforts.

Whatever the eventual outcome, one implication is already clear for families: regulation is not, in the near term, a substitute for visibility at home. The accounts largely still exist; they are simply less discussed.

What Australian kids' screen use actually looks like

MeasureFigureSource
Kids 8–12 who had used social media or messaging apps (pre-rules)84%eSafety Commissioner, 2024
Average daily screen time at home, Australian children (parent-reported)4.5+ hoursRCH National Child Health Poll
Children exceeding national screen time recommendationsMajority, across all age groupsRCH National Child Health Poll
Australian children under 2 with regular screen time (vs guidance of none)63%RCH National Child Health Poll
Educators reporting declining student focus78%Gonski Institute, Growing Up Digital Australia
Teachers who say digital tech is a growing distraction84%Gonski Institute

Parents' concerns — and the official guidance

The Royal Children's Hospital National Child Health Poll, a national survey of Australian households, has repeatedly found excessive screen time to be the number one health concern parents hold for children — cited as a problem by more than 90% of parents, ahead of cyberbullying (second) and internet safety (third). Australia's official 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommend no screen time before age 2, no more than an hour a day for ages 2–5, and no more than 2 hours of recreational screen time for ages 5–17 — thresholds the RCH polling shows most Australian children exceed.

Australian adults are no exception to the global picture, averaging around six hours a day online per DataReportal's country data — meaning the family screen time conversation is rarely only about the kids.

For Australian parents navigating the new rules: eSafety maintains official guidance for families at esafety.gov.au, including which platforms are restricted, how age checks work, and conversation resources for talking with under-16s about the change.

The rules changed. The need to understand didn't.

ThirdLife is built in Australia for families navigating exactly this moment: a pattern-level view of your child's digital life — themes, safety signals, sleep and AI use — without reading their messages. The beta is live — join the queue for the next wave.

Join the beta queue

Frequently asked questions

Is social media banned for under-16s in Australia?

Since 10 December 2025, platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Reddit and X must take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from holding accounts. eSafety describes it as a delay rather than a ban — under-16s face no penalties, can still view public content, and messaging, gaming and education services are excluded.

Is Australia's under-16 social media law working?

Compliance is contested. eSafety data from March 2026 showed about 7 in 10 underage children still held accounts, and a June 2026 BMJ study found 85% of surveyed 12–17-year-olds using restricted platforms. In June 2026 the government announced doubled penalties (to $99 million) and stronger enforcement powers in response.

What are the penalties for platforms that don't comply?

Civil penalties of up to $49.5 million, with legislation announced in June 2026 to double the maximum to $99 million and expand eSafety's information-gathering powers.

What are Australia's official screen time guidelines?

The 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommend no screen time before age 2, no more than 1 hour daily for ages 2–5, and no more than 2 hours of recreational screen time for ages 5–17. RCH polling shows the majority of Australian children exceed these at every age.

Sources

  1. eSafety Commissioner — Social media age restrictions and implementation updates
  2. Australian Government — Social Media Minimum Age
  3. NPR — Australia plans to strengthen under-16 social media laws (June 2026, covering the BMJ study and eSafety data)
  4. Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne — National Child Health Poll
  5. Australian Institute of Family Studies — Screen time effects and guidelines
  6. Gonski Institute for Education — Growing Up Digital Australia
  7. DataReportal — Digital reports, Australia country data